This article could have been written a year ago. however today, it is pure nonsense. The author wasn't paying attention to the rapprochement and "nouvelle entente" between India and China.? While the author bangs away at Obama-era Indian relations, and the 4 year border problem between China and India, did he not learn of the concessions China made to resolve the border problem prior to Kazan? and why Modi is seen holding hands with Xi after a significant accord between the two? It would take an article to explain why India had a change of heart vis a vis the US, but for those who have followed the US's geopopiical overtures towards India over the recent years, including the recent rush of American money into Indian stock exchanges to signal to the world that "india is one of us", they clearly did not pay attention to the needs of India, let alone to its geopolitical aspirations. Which is why the US-India deal is a thing of the past. If there is one interloper in the BRICS, it is Bazil. Lula it must be recalled, has already been behind bars for fraud. Clearly the CIA tunred him and he has since gone cold on the BRICS, making a pathetic excuse for not showing up (sorry, no sex tonight, I have a headache :-)) . Never mind, Brazil has nothing the BRICS need, and so in due course this country will be given its marching orders. Aside Brazil and the hesitancy of the KSA to sign up to BRICS with pen to paper, and this owing to its deep investments in western masrkets that are captive to confiscation, the Kazan summit was a total success for moving to break western monopolies around the world. It will be good for the West too, not its leaders, but the public at large will benefit from an end to western wars.
This article could have been written a year ago. however today, it is pure nonsense. The author wasn't paying attention to the rapprochement and "nouvelle entente" between India and China.? While the author bangs away at Obama-era Indian relations, and the 4 year border problem between China and India, did he not learn of the concessions China made to resolve the border problem prior to Kazan? and why Modi is seen holding hands with Xi after a significant accord between the two? It would take an article to explain why India had a change of heart vis a vis the US, but for those who have followed the US's geopopiical overtures towards India over the recent years, including the recent rush of American money into Indian stock exchanges to signal to the world that "india is one of us", they clearly did not pay attention to the needs of India, let alone to its geopolitical aspirations. Which is why the US-India deal is a thing of the past. If there is one interloper in the BRICS, it is Bazil. Lula it must be recalled, has already been behind bars for fraud. Clearly the CIA tunred him and he has since gone cold on the BRICS, making a pathetic excuse for not showing up (sorry, no sex tonight, I have a headache :-)) . Never mind, Brazil has nothing the BRICS need, and so in due course this country will be given its marching orders. Aside Brazil and the hesitancy of the KSA to sign up to BRICS with pen to paper, and this owing to its deep investments in western masrkets that are captive to confiscation, the Kazan summit was a total success for moving to break western monopolies around the world. It will be good for the West too, not its leaders, but the public at large will benefit from an end to western wars.
I hear you. There is a split.. old stories as new. But the truth is they just aren’t thinking anymore.
Your the only publication that I know is writing so heavily on brics even here in the east it’s silent